Terminology » RF Basics » IR vs RF Remote Controls: Key Differences Explained

IR vs RF Remote Controls: Key Differences Explained

rf ir remote control radio frequency infrared

This article breaks down the differences between IR (Infrared) and RF (Radio Frequency) remote controls. RF uses radio waves ranging from 3 KHz to 300 GHz, while IR utilizes infrared waves spanning 300 GHz to 400 THz. Infrared wavelengths fall between 700 nm and 1 mm.

Both IR and RF remotes serve the same basic purpose: controlling devices remotely, most commonly TVs. Let’s dive into the key distinctions. The shift from IR to RF remotes is largely due to the advantages of RF and the relative ease of replacing IR LEDs with RF transmitters and IR receivers with RF counterparts. However, RF hardware is generally considered more complex than IR. Therefore, choosing between IR and RF depends on the intended application.

Key Differences: IR vs RF

The following table summarizes the key differences between the two technologies:

SpecificationsIR (Infrared) RemoteRF (Radio Frequency) Remote
Coverage RangeUp to 10 metersUp to 50 meters at LOS (Line of Sight)
Data Rate500 bps to 1 kbpsUp to 100 kbps
Regional RegulationNo limitationRegulation limits (ETSI/FCC compliance required)
Transmit Power Consumption (ON)20 to 150 mA (dependent on LEDs & range)5 to 20 mA
Receive Power Consumption (STAND-BY)Approx. 1 mAApprox. 5 mA (continuous receiving)
Bidirectional CommunicationNot possible (due to power consumption)Possible
Bits per FrameMaximum 40 bitsAbout 80 to 140 bits
ProtocolsPulse distance/Manchester coding on 38 KHzASK, FSK, etc.
Example DevicesTI MSP430 based TV IR remote transmitterInfineon PMAfob RF Remote transmitter

Deep Dive into the Differences

  • Coverage: RF remotes offer significantly better range (up to 50 meters with line of sight) compared to IR remotes (up to 10 meters). This allows for greater flexibility in controlling devices from a distance.
  • Line of Sight: IR remotes require a direct line of sight between the remote and the device. RF remotes, on the other hand, can work through walls and obstacles.
  • Data Rate: RF remotes boast much higher data rates (up to 100 kbps) than IR remotes (500 bps to 1 kbps), enabling more complex control and communication.
  • Power Consumption: IR remotes typically consume more power during transmission (20-150 mA) due to the LEDs, while RF remotes are more energy-efficient (5-20 mA). However, RF remotes consume more power in standby mode due to continuous receiving.
  • Bidirectional Communication: RF remotes support bidirectional communication, meaning the device can send information back to the remote. IR remotes are generally unidirectional.
  • Regulation: RF devices are subject to regulatory limits defined by organizations like ETSI and FCC, requiring compliance testing. IR devices have no such limitations.
  • Protocols: IR remotes commonly use modulation techniques like pulse distance coding and Manchester coding on a 38 kHz carrier. RF remotes use modulation techniques like ASK and FSK.