VLC vs RF | difference between VLC and RF Communication
This page compares VLC vs RF and describes basic difference between VLC and RF Communication types. VLC stands for Visible Light Communication and RF stands for Radio Frequency. Basic comparison between VLC communication and RF communication are also derived.
Both VLC and RF communication technologies are used for wide variety of applications for wireless communication. VLC uses light as medium for communication where as RF uses EM waves. Let us understand them individually before we derive difference between them.
Following are the features of VLC communication.
• It uses wavelength range from 380 nm to 750 nm (i.e. frequency range from 430 THz to 790 THz) for communication.
• Data to be transmitted is modulated before transmission by modulating the light. PA (Power Amplifier) is not needed unlike RF communication.
• LEDs and lasers are used as transmitter or source. Photodiode detectors are used as receivers.
• Example application: LiFi tutorial >>
Following are the features of RF communication.
• It uses frequency range from 3KHz to 300 MHz in RF band and 300 MHz to 300 GHz in microwave band as shown in the figure-1.
• Data to be transmitted is modulated before transmission by various analog/digital modulation techniques. Analog modulation techniques include AM, FM, PM etc. Digital modulation techniques include ASK, FSK, PSK, BPSK, QPSK, 16QAM etc.
• Electromagnetic transmitter and receiver are used along with antenna for transmission and reception purposes. PA (Power Amplifier) is used at transmitter in order to compensate for path losses.
• Example applications: WiFi, GSM, Zigbee, satellite etc.
Compare VLC vs RF | Table of Comparison between VLC and RF
Following table compares VLC vs RF and derives difference between VLC and RF communication types with respect to various features.
|Full form||Visible Light Communication||Radio Frequency|
|EM Interference||VLC communication is not affected due to EM sources.||RF communication is affected due to EM sources.|
|Power Consumption||Less, It is power efficient system.||High, It is power inefficient system.|
|Security concern||It provides secured communication due to LOS (Line Of Sight) communication within the room.||It does not provide secured communication as RF signal penetrate walls and can be intruded by some one from the other room.|
|Health risk||No health risks involved in VLC based wireless communication.||RF communication is harmful when high power is used for transmission.|
|Installation||Easier||Medium to hard, depends on indoor/outdoor applications.|
|Need for PA (Power Amplifier)||Not required||Required|
Conclusion of VLC vs. RF: Both VLC and RF communications coexist together due to their unique features for communication. For example, VLC is ideal for short distance where as RF is ideal for long distance communication. VLC is ideal for indoor application where as RF is ideal for indoor/outdoor communication depending upon technologies such as wifi, gsm, satellite etc. They are complementary technologies used together for data communication.
LiFi and WiFi Related Links
what is difference between
difference between FDM and OFDM
Difference between SC-FDMA and OFDM
Difference between SISO and MIMO
Difference between TDD and FDD
Difference between 802.11 standards viz.11-a,11-b,11-g and 11-n
OFDM vs OFDMA
CDMA vs GSM
Bluetooth vs zigbee
Fixed wimax vs mobile