Advantages of WiFi HaLow | disadvantages of WiFi HaLow, 802.11ah

This page covers advantages and disadvantages of WiFi HaLow (IEEE 802.11ah). It mentions benefits or advantages of WiFi HaLow and drawbacks or disadvantages of WiFi HaLow.

What is WiFi HaLow (IEEE 802.11ah) ?

Introduction:
Traditional wifi standards are not preferable for IoT applications due to high power consumption and larger frame overhead. Hence WiFi Alliance has developed WiFi HaLow which supports lower power consumption and longer range of operation. It is defined in IEEE 802.11ah.

IEEE 802.11ah operates in sub GHz band (i.e. 900 MHz). It has different PHY and MAC layer designs and hence 802.11ah hardware is more power efficient than its predecessor.

WiFi HaLow Frequency Bands

Following are the technical features of WiFi HaLow as defined in 802.11ah standard.
• Frequency Band: 900 MHz (US), 850 MHz (Europe), 700 MHz (China)
• Bandwidth: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 MHz
• Modulation type: BPSK to 256 QAM
• Channel Architecture: SC, OFDM
• Maximum Data Rate: 40 Mbps
• Coverage range: About 1 Km
• Max. transmit power: 100 mWatt
• Security : WPA
Refer WiFi HaLow basics which describes functions of PHY and MAC layer defined in IEEE 802.11ah.

Benefits or advantages of WiFi HaLow

Following are the benefits or advantages of WiFi HaLow:
➨It consumes less power than traditional wifi device. Hence wifi HaLow devices with coin cell battery work for months or years.
➨It offers longer coverage range which is about 1 Km. This is almost twice that of traditional wifi.
➨The WiFi HaLow signal can easily penetrate through walls and other obstacles as it is lower in value compare to high frequency (2.4 GHz/5 GHz) used by traditional wifi network.
➨It does not require any proprietary hubs or gateways.
➨It offers reliable wireless link due to use of less congested frequency band, higher sensitivity and link margin.
➨WiFi HaLow is ideal for short and bursty data used for IoT (Internet of Things) which does not consume more power and requires to travel longer distances. This is useful for smart building applications such as smart lighting, smart security, smart parking, smart city, smart HVAC etc.
➨MAC layer is designed to support thousands of connected devices. WiFi HaLow can support up to 8191 devices with single AP (Access Point).
➨It is used for cellular traffic offloading due to its outdoor extended range.
➨Sub-GHz frequency used in 802.11h suffers from lower interference compare to 2.4 GHz band.

Drawbacks or disadvantages of WiFi HaLow

Following are the drawbacks or disadvantages of WiFi HaLow:
➨There is no global standard for 900 MHz band unlike 2.4 GHz used everywhere in the world. Moreover WiFi HaLow is US centric.
➨Antennas in sub-GHz range are larger compare to 2.4 GHz WiFi system.
➨WiFi HaLow may have higher latency compared to some other IoT protocols, making it less ideal for applications requiring real-time communication.
➨The availability of sub-1 GHz spectrum varies by country, potentially limiting the global applicability of WiFi HaLow. Regulatory differences can impact the deployment and performance of WiFi HaLow networks.
➨As a newer standard, WiFi HaLow may have limited support in consumer devices. Many current IoT devices may not yet be compatible with WiFi HaLow, leading to slower adoption.
➨Although WiFi HaLow is designed for low power consumption, it may still consume more power compared to some other low-power wireless technologies like Zigbee or Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), which are specifically optimized for very low energy usage.
➨As with any wireless technology, security is a concern. Ensuring robust security measures in low-power IoT devices can be challenging and vulnerabilities in WiFi HaLow could be exploited if not properly addressed.

Conclusion : Overall, WiFi HaLow (IEEE 802.11ah) presents a promising solution for various IoT applications, offering significant advantages such as extended range, low power consumption, better penetration through obstacles and high device density support. These features make it particularly suitable for large scale deployments in smart cities, industrial IoT and agricultural monitoring.



Similar posts on 802.11 WLAN (Wi-Fi) variants

IoT Wireless Technologies

WLAN    THREAD    EnOcean    LoRa    SIGFOX    WHDI    Zigbee   6LoWPAN   Zigbee RF4CE   Z-Wave   NFC   RFID   Lonworks   CEBus   UPB  

What is Difference between

RF and Wireless Terminologies