Sigfox vs Wireless-M Bus : A Comparative Analysis

Introduction: Sigfox and Wireless-M Bus are two prominent technologies for IoT communication, each serving distinct purposes. Sigfox is a global LPWAN technology optimized for ultra-low-power and cost-effective data transmission, while Wireless-M Bus is widely used in metering applications, offering reliable communication for smart utilities. This guide compares their features, strengths, and best fit applications to help you decide which technology meets your IoT requirements.

Difference between Sigfox and Wireless-M Bus

Specifications Sigfox Wireless M-Bus
Usage (bytes per day) less than 200 bytes/day (typical),
5 kbytes/day (maximum)
less than 200 bytes/day (typical)
less than 50 kbytes/day (maximum)
data rate (payload) 10 to 100 bps (typical for one message)
less than 50 kbps (max. peak)
2.4 to 4.8 kbps (typical for one message)
19.2 kbps (max.)
Coverage distance 10 to 12 km (city areas)
40 to 60 Km (country side areas)
upto 1 Km (city areas)
upto 7 Km (country side areas)
Frequency bands 433 MHz, 868 MHz m 915 MHz (<1 GHz) 169 MHz
Link budget upto 170 dB (100 bps, 500 mWatt) upto 150 dB (2.4 kbps, 500 mWatt)
Frame size (payload size) 12 bytes (typical) 30 to 130 bytes (typical)
latency max. ms to seconds ms to seconds
applications telemetry and tracking, alarm, control, sensing Smart metering
unique applications supports nomadic (across the cell) and mobility fixed network
RF Wireless World References Refer SIGFOX tutorial>>. Refer What is wireless M-Bus>> and
M-Bus vs Wireless M-Bus>>.

Conclusion

Both Sigfox and Wireless-M Bus have proven effective in their respective domains. Understanding their differences ensures you select the most suitable technology for your IoT project, whether it’s focused on metering or general IoT connectivity.

SigFox tutorial RELATED LINKS

What is difference between

RF and Wireless Terminologies